Life360 Lawsuit: A Complete Guide for Affected Users

Key Points

• Multiple legal matters have involved Life360, primarily related to privacy, location data sharing, driving data collection, data breaches, and Tile tracker misuse, but there is no single active class action settlement available for users as of February 2026.
• The most relevant ongoing matter is the Texas Attorney General’s 2025 lawsuit against Allstate and Arity, which highlights Life360 as an app allegedly used to collect and share driving data without adequate consent—potentially impacting users’ insurance rates.
• A 2024 data breach exposed personal information of approximately 443,000 users, and investigations continue into possible claims.
• Past cases, including a 2023 location data sales lawsuit (dismissed) and a Tile stalking lawsuit (partially stayed), underscore recurring privacy concerns.
• Evidence suggests Life360 has adjusted some data practices, but questions remain about transparency and user consent in data partnerships.

Overview of Life360 Legal Issues: Life360 is a popular family safety app used by millions for real-time location sharing and driving monitoring. Legal scrutiny has focused on whether the company adequately protected user data or disclosed sharing practices, especially with third parties like data analytics firms. These issues matter because they involve sensitive personal information—location history, driving behavior—that can affect privacy, safety, and financial outcomes like insurance premiums.

Who May Be Affected: Current or past Life360 users, particularly those who enabled location or driving features, may have had data collected or shared. Tile users face separate risks related to device-enabled tracking. No widespread compensation fund exists yet, but individual claims or future actions remain possible.

What Users Can Do Now: Review app privacy settings, limit permissions, monitor insurance communications, and check personal data exposure via services like Have I Been Pwned. Consult a qualified attorney for personal circumstances—this guide provides information only.

Life360, a leading family safety and location-sharing application, has faced several legal challenges since the early 2020s, primarily centered on privacy, data collection, sharing practices, security incidents, and product design concerns with its Tile tracking devices. These matters have drawn attention from regulators, class action attorneys, and privacy advocates due to the sensitive nature of location and behavioral data involved. As of February 2026, no comprehensive class action settlement has been finalized for Life360 users, but ongoing investigations and related litigation continue to shape the landscape.

This detailed overview examines the primary legal actions, their status, underlying legal principles, and practical implications for users. It draws from court filings, regulatory announcements, security reports, and legal analyses to provide a factual account of developments.

Background and Legal Context

Life360 launched as a consumer-facing tool for family coordination, offering features such as real-time GPS tracking, crash detection, and driving reports. The app’s functionality requires extensive access to device location, motion sensors, and other data. Over time, the company expanded revenue through data partnerships, including aggregated insights and, historically, precise location data sales.

Early scrutiny emerged from investigative reporting in late 2021, which revealed Life360 was selling precise location data to brokers. This practice raised questions under consumer protection laws, privacy statutes, and unfair competition doctrines. In response, Life360 announced in January 2022 that it would cease most sales of precise location data, shifting toward aggregated or limited sharing.

Subsequent concerns focused on embedded software development kits (SDKs) from third parties that collect telematics data—detailed records of speed, braking, acceleration, and routes. These practices intersect with state privacy laws, such as the Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA), and federal frameworks like the Federal Trade Commission Act’s prohibition on unfair or deceptive acts.

Key Legal Issues Explained

Several core legal concepts recur across Life360-related matters:

• Consent and Transparency: Many claims allege inadequate disclosure or affirmative consent for data collection and sharing. Under laws like the TDPSA and California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), businesses must provide clear notice and options to opt out of certain data sales or sharing.
• Unjust Enrichment and Unfair Business Practices: Complaints often assert that companies benefit financially from user data without compensating users or obtaining proper permission, potentially violating state unfair competition laws (e.g., California Business & Professions Code § 17200).
• Negligence in Data Security: Breaches trigger claims for failure to implement reasonable safeguards, leading to exposure of personal information and potential harm such as identity theft risk.
• Product Liability and Design Defects: In Tile-related litigation, plaintiffs argue that device features (e.g., unencrypted signals, static identifiers) foreseeably enable misuse like stalking, creating liability under product liability or privacy tort theories.

These issues balance consumer privacy rights against the utility of location-based services. Courts often examine whether disclosures were conspicuous and whether users had meaningful choice.

Latest Developments and Case Status

As of February 2026, the legal landscape includes resolved, stayed, and ongoing matters:

• Texas Attorney General v. Allstate and Arity (filed January 13, 2025): Texas AG Ken Paxton sued Allstate and subsidiary Arity, alleging unlawful collection, use, and sale of location and driving data from over 45 million consumers via embedded SDKs in mobile apps, explicitly naming Life360 as an example. The suit claims violations of the TDPSA, asserting lack of notice/consent and use of data to justify insurance premium increases. This is the first enforcement action under a comprehensive state privacy law. The case remains ongoing, with no resolution reported.
• Tile Tracker Stalking Class Action (Ireland-Gordy v. Tile, Life360, Amazon, N.D. Cal. No. 3:23-cv-04119): Filed in 2023, alleges Tile devices enable stalking due to predictable design flaws. In August 2025, the court dismissed some claims as time-barred and stayed others pending arbitration.
• 2024 Data Breaches: A June 2024 breach affected Tile customer-support data (names, emails, phones, addresses); a July 2024 API misconfiguration exposed ~443,000 records. Attorneys continue investigating potential claims, but no class action has been certified.
• Prior Data-Sales Case (E.S. v. Life360, N.D. Cal. No. 3:23-cv-00168): Filed January 2023; voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in November 2023.

Several law firms pursue individual arbitration claims against Life360 related to data practices.

Overview of Major Life360-Related Legal Actions

Who Is Affected and Potential Impact

• Life360 Users: Anyone who used the app (especially driving or location features) may have had telematics data shared with third parties, potentially influencing insurance decisions.
• Tile Users: Individuals using Tile trackers face risks from misuse, including stalking or harassment.
• Broader Implications: Exposed data from breaches increases identity theft risk; shared driving data could lead to higher premiums or denied coverage.

Potential outcomes include regulatory fines, injunctive relief (e.g., improved disclosures), or compensation in future actions.

What This Means Going Forward

These cases highlight evolving expectations around data privacy in consumer apps. The Texas action underscores state-level enforcement of privacy rights, potentially influencing national standards. Life360 has integrated Tile fully and adjusted data practices, but users should remain vigilant.

Monitor official announcements from Life360, state attorneys general, and the FTC. Future developments may include new filings, settlements, or regulatory guidance.

Conclusion

Life360-related legal matters reflect broader tensions between innovative location services and privacy protections. While some cases have concluded and others remain in early stages, affected users should stay informed about developments and review their data exposure. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for guidance tailored to your situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a current Life360 class action settlement I can claim?

No active settlement fund exists as of February 2026. Some firms investigate individual claims or potential future class actions.

Was my data sold without permission?

Historical precise location sales ended in 2022. Current concerns center on telematics sharing via partners like Arity.

What should I do if I was in the 2024 breach?

Check Have I Been Pwned, change passwords, enable two-factor authentication, and contact attorneys if you received a notice.

Can Life360 users sue over higher insurance rates?

Individual arbitration claims are being pursued; direct causation is complex and case-specific.

How do I protect my privacy on Life360?

Limit permissions, review data sharing settings, use opt-outs, and disable unnecessary features.

Does Tile still pose stalking risks?

Research indicates ongoing concerns with encryption and identifiers; Life360 has added anti-stalking tools, but vigilance is advised.

You May Also Like: Legal Analysis: The Stakes in the Edward Jones Kingsview Advisors Lawsuit